Catfightreport: to give you the benefit of doubt, I steeled myself with strong drink, said a brief prayer, and read your "awesome" interview. Some questions spring to mind:
*Exactly which parts were awesome? Surely you weren't suggesting it was "awesome" in its entirety?
*Why is this woman, who has never been involved in a fight, knows no females who have, and keeps our fetish at arm's length, to be charitable, relevant?
* What does " ...regarding questions relating to catfights..." mean precisely? Is there some hidden message, or is this just another example of your clumsy, tortured relationship with the language?
*As you have a soft spot (or, is it a hard-on?) for older women, and a penchant for interviewing those who have not been in, or have knowledge of, catfights, do we have "awesome" interviews with, say, Madeline Albright and Helen Thomas to look forward to? These media-savvy seniors might supply some much-needed gravitas to you and your "target audience." Have I inspired a possible poll matchup for you?