Now look. In my book, the act of "losing" is, in itself, humiliation enough. The only additional punishment I would consider, is making The Bitch watch as I suck on the cock of the man we were fighting for. Now that is what I'd call "ultimate surrender".
Perhaps 'losing" is sufficient humiliation in the situation Maureen describes because she would win by decommissioning the sexuality of her victim by her cunning tactics. Further, while the victim nurses her wounded pussy, she is further humiliated by knowing that the male has a hard cock ripe for the winner to suck due to watching her crotch mauled by the dominant female.
In “loser gets fucked” the women are not fighting over a man. They are fighting for the right to dominate and fuck one another.
They are known as “loser gets fucked” because the loser gets fucked at the end of the fight. Winner gets laid is based on a different fantasy altogether.
If you want to see the winner sucking some guy's cock at the end, fair enough, that's your thing. But not at the end of a loser gets fucked fight. The clue is in the title.
Imo, "loser gets fucked" are filmed more often than "winner gets laid" because they have a broader appeal. They can be enjoyed as much by fans who are turned on by the loser of the fight, or winner and loser equally, as by those who are turned on by the winner only.
And I don't think many catfight fans would appreciate having the girl/girl action they love interrupted by some guy getting his dick out!
