[de Trixah]

Back in the 80ies (1988 or something), Jamie Lee and Kim have a discussion, that turns to argument, that turns to catfight. Who would have won?

Comments are welcome 

Left:
Jamie Lee Curtis, born 22nd of november, height 170cm/5.7ft, weight 68kg/145lb

Right: Kim Basinger
born 8th of december 1953, height 170cm/5.7ft, weight 57kg/125lb

Pics

[de Trixah]

More pics

[de Trixah]

Once again, I am surprised how one-sided the voting is so far. I would bet on Jamie Lee too, but did nort expect her to litterally slaughter poor Kim (31-11 in votes and 49-13 in points) 

[FightFantasy]

Once again, I am surprised how one-sided the voting is so far. I would bet on Jamie Lee too, but did nort expect her to litterally slaughter poor Kim (31-11 in votes and 49-13 in points) 

I think, it's because of weight difference. Actually the ratio of votes seem to reflect her chances to win pretty realistically It's around 30%, not that bad really.

[Patrick]

Once again, I am surprised how one-sided the voting is so far. I would bet on Jamie Lee too, but did nort expect her to litterally slaughter poor Kim (31-11 in votes and 49-13 in points) 

I think, it's because of weight difference. Actually the ratio of votes seem to reflect her chances to win pretty realistically It's around 30%, not that bad really.

Size... but, also,, just pure toughness and nastiness... Jaime-Lee just seems like she can be a ''brutal female'' and Kim seems to be on the opposite end of that spectrum 

[IronLuigi]

Jamie Lee has always been an erotic dream in my childhood. Obviously I think Kim is gorgeous but JL is more fit and badass, so I think she would destroy Kim.

[rawhide]

IRL, any woman with really long, thick hair like Kim, usually doesn't win a catfight against another woman with thin, closely cropped hair like Jamie Lee. When Jamie Lee's weight advantage is also considered, I'd place my bet on her. Personally, I've always found Kim sexier, but they're both attractive in different ways.