[HumanPerson]

The simple solution is to require an indicator that a story involves AI, and to what extent that is true.

AI created = used prompts to generate the entire story.
AI edited = used AI to fix grammar, spelling, and word choices.
AI prompted = used a prompt to generate story ideas and then wrote them manually.

[Nutmeg]

The simple solution is to require an indicator that a story involves AI, and to what extent that is true.

AI created = used prompts to generate the entire story.
AI edited = used AI to fix grammar, spelling, and word choices.
AI prompted = used a prompt to generate story ideas and then wrote them manually.

As a requirement that is far from simple to enforce. Because of people like you who abused even clearly stated rules like the ones for Series. For those who don't know , any writer HumanPerson doesn't like who takes more than two posts to post a story who get reported as something that should moved to the Series section. Even though we stated only the catfight section was under those rules and the purpose was to remove stories who were being micro posted into existence. If you looked at that section you would know exactly who that rules was created about.

So if we made it a requirement versus the current suggestion to label your stories as AI written, we would have you and others who take that as their chance to artistically cleanse the stories section of everyone they don't like as a writer by reporting them as AI. Then after half the first page gets labelled as AI complete the cleansing by moving them to their own section. Oh sure some of the stuff we might report was before AI was a thing but a few eggs get broken to make this omelet right?

So no we aren't making anything like that a requirement. The only way we could detect AI stories is by using   an AI Hmm maybe Catposter the engagement AI for the site would be next to keep sections active like on facebook. This has possibilites...

[MikeHales67]

I found it hard to disagree with what this guy is saying. I have yet to read a wonderful story and then later found out it was AI  I've read lots of average stories and thw3tfound out they were AI, though.
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2025/08/ai-isnt-killing-literature-it-isnt-even-close-to-replacing-professional-writers/

[HumanPerson]

The simple solution is to require an indicator that a story involves AI, and to what extent that is true.

AI created = used prompts to generate the entire story.
AI edited = used AI to fix grammar, spelling, and word choices.
AI prompted = used a prompt to generate story ideas and then wrote them manually.

As a requirement that is far from simple to enforce. Because of people like you who abused even clearly stated rules like the ones for Series. For those who don't know , any writer HumanPerson doesn't like who takes more than two posts to post a story who get reported as something that should moved to the Series section. Even though we stated only the catfight section was under those rules and the purpose was to remove stories who were being micro posted into existence. If you looked at that section you would know exactly who that rules was created about.

So if we made it a requirement versus the current suggestion to label your stories as AI written, we would have you and others who take that as their chance to artistically cleanse the stories section of everyone they don't like as a writer by reporting them as AI. Then after half the first page gets labelled as AI complete the cleansing by moving them to their own section. Oh sure some of the stuff we might report was before AI was a thing but a few eggs get broken to make this omelet right?

So no we aren't making anything like that a requirement. The only way we could detect AI stories is by using   an AI Hmm maybe Catposter the engagement AI for the site would be next to keep sections active like on facebook. This has possibilites...

Yeah, requirement was the wrong word. Suggestion or recommendation would make more sense. There are some legitimately useful ways to employ AI to improve storytelling, but it seems like most of what gets posted is literally just the first response to the first prompt with no further effort.

[Am]

hello, i was wondering, has anyone had any luck with AI generated text to write stories?
thanks for any info!!

What about Ai generated hairpulling images?

[CoffeeMug]

Last week, I spent a bunch of time at work fixing text that someone had used AI to write. IMO, AI-generated text looks okay at first, but the more time you spend with it, the more you see the patterns and the worse it gets.

[sinclairfan]

Last week, I spent a bunch of time at work fixing text that someone had used AI to write. IMO, AI-generated text looks okay at first, but the more time you spend with it, the more you see the patterns and the worse it gets.

For what it's worth:  I've found that while the first 1 to 3 drafts are "way off", upon reflection, you'll usually find that the prompt by the human user wasn't written quite right.  By draft 4, you start approaching a masterpiece.

[My_asian_wife]

AI is simply a tool that many people mistake for being able to replace a person, rather than helping that person be more productive. Most AI is not even intelligent, that's why its easy to spot, it repeats text and ideas.

my experience writing in AI is that it can often disregard your instruction, producing output you did not want, and contradicts itself constantly as it fails to evaluate the small part it just wrote with the whole stary.