[caryn1]

Often  it depends on type of fight and why.
The location as well

[KateA - The Devil In Heels]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

[Alexandra X]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

[KateA - The Devil In Heels]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

[Alexandra X]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

I think you're getting something mixed up. Just because a girl fights other girls doesn't make her a professional fighter. I've fought bitches just like me, and I haven't always won, but I do have some experience. Maybe you and I could have an epic catfight. But if I decided to fight Natalia Ragozina (world champion in professional boxing in the super middleweight category according to the WIBF, IWBF, WIBA, WBA, WBC, WIBC and GBU. Nickname - "Sledgehammer"), even though she's 49 now, she'll beat me without breaking a sweat.

[KateA - The Devil In Heels]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

I think you're getting something mixed up. Just because a girl fights other girls doesn't make her a professional fighter. I've fought bitches just like me, and I haven't always won, but I do have some experience. Maybe you and I could have an epic catfight. But if I decided to fight Natalia Ragozina (world champion in professional boxing in the super middleweight category according to the WIBF, IWBF, WIBA, WBA, WBC, WIBC and GBU. Nickname - "Sledgehammer"), even though she's 49 now, she'll beat me without breaking a sweat.

Sasha,

I never mentioned professional fighters at any point—the attributes I listed are ones that any amateur or ordinary woman can possess. All I did was outline the ingredients I believe make a good fighter, or specifically a catfighter. As I’ve said repeatedly, there’s no silver bullet when it comes to personal combat.

Age is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

Experience is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

These are simply factors and attributes to consider. We could certainly debate which ones are more important. But your pivot to the example of you fighting Natalia Ragozina is, sadly, a case of straw manning my argument.

Xoxo
Kate

[Alexandra X]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

I think you're getting something mixed up. Just because a girl fights other girls doesn't make her a professional fighter. I've fought bitches just like me, and I haven't always won, but I do have some experience. Maybe you and I could have an epic catfight. But if I decided to fight Natalia Ragozina (world champion in professional boxing in the super middleweight category according to the WIBF, IWBF, WIBA, WBA, WBC, WIBC and GBU. Nickname - "Sledgehammer"), even though she's 49 now, she'll beat me without breaking a sweat.

Sasha,

I never mentioned professional fighters at any point—the attributes I listed are ones that any amateur or ordinary woman can possess. All I did was outline the ingredients I believe make a good fighter, or specifically a catfighter. As I’ve said repeatedly, there’s no silver bullet when it comes to personal combat.

Age is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

Experience is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

These are simply factors and attributes to consider. We could certainly debate which ones are more important. But your pivot to the example of you fighting Natalia Ragozina is, sadly, a case of straw manning my argument.

Xoxo
Kate

Kate, I'm not going to argue with you because it would be completely off-topic. I can only say that an ordinary woman who has a job, a family, and all sorts of household chores simply doesn’t have time to develop strength, endurance, or anything mental or psychological.

And you could have said hello to me

[KateA - The Devil In Heels]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

I think you're getting something mixed up. Just because a girl fights other girls doesn't make her a professional fighter. I've fought bitches just like me, and I haven't always won, but I do have some experience. Maybe you and I could have an epic catfight. But if I decided to fight Natalia Ragozina (world champion in professional boxing in the super middleweight category according to the WIBF, IWBF, WIBA, WBA, WBC, WIBC and GBU. Nickname - "Sledgehammer"), even though she's 49 now, she'll beat me without breaking a sweat.

Sasha,

I never mentioned professional fighters at any point—the attributes I listed are ones that any amateur or ordinary woman can possess. All I did was outline the ingredients I believe make a good fighter, or specifically a catfighter. As I’ve said repeatedly, there’s no silver bullet when it comes to personal combat.

Age is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

Experience is no guarantee of success in a catfight!

These are simply factors and attributes to consider. We could certainly debate which ones are more important. But your pivot to the example of you fighting Natalia Ragozina is, sadly, a case of straw manning my argument.

Xoxo
Kate

Kate, I'm not going to argue with you because it would be completely off-topic. I can only say that an ordinary woman who has a job, a family, and all sorts of household chores simply doesn’t have time to develop strength, endurance, or anything mental or psychological.

And you could have said hello to me

Hi Sasha,

Me not saying hello, sorry that’s on me. I’m just rather preoccupied at the moment dealing with forms and lawyers

Anyway to get back to the topic at hand, an ordinary woman absolutely can develop these attributes. However will she develop them to that of say an elite sports woman? Probably not, in fact almost certainly not. And she doesn’t need too in my opinion

However an ordinary woman absolutely can develop the attributes I mentioned. Before a knee injury of mine I was running 5-7km most days, these longer distance runs developed my endurance for sure.

And maybe if one day my knee can be fixed, I might just hit my target of running 10km

Xoxo
Kate

[NekoKitsune]

Do mature women beat younger women more often? In my experience that statement is true they enjoy beating younger beautiful women like me I have seen it and I have also endured when I was 31yo (currently 34) I got my butt soundly beaten by a 50yo woman and just recently I saw a good friend of mine Becca 27yo get absolutely demolished by a 51yo woman named Marie she took her time and real pleasure in torturing and dismantling my friend it was so brutal my eyes got watery and I had to turn my head because i couldn’t bare to see her finishing my friend her sobbing and begging for mercy were haunting enough. So hence my original question
Do mature women beat younger women more often ? And why do they take so much pleasure in beating us and humiliating us ?

You are 34 years old, you consider yourself young and beautiful, but I am 23 years old, so which of us is young and which is mature? If we had a fight and you won, I would start telling everyone that I was beaten by a mature woman. Then you could answer your question, why do they take so much pleasure in beating us and humiliating us?

[Alix_Fights]

I actually saw a mature vs young woman fight at a dive bar when I was in college.  I was there with a bunch of my girlfriends, when all of a sudden there was a scream.  This older woman pulled this younger woman off some guy's lap and started pulling her hair, slapping and punching her.  The younger woman fought back, but it was over in under a minute, with the younger woman on the floor crying.  We got the story from one of the bartenders afterward.  Seems this younger woman was a regular, and enjoyed getting free drinks from men (duh, who doesn't) by flirting with them.  Unfortunately, this guy's girlfriend was there and didn't care for that.  They were the same size, so the fight should have been more equal, but the anger of the older woman seemed to be the deciding factor.  So I think the deciding factor was emotion in this case.  It seemed that both women knew how to fight, and the younger woman seemed to be confident, but the anger of the older woman was more than enough to win the fight.  Just my opinion.

[Olga]

When I was a schoolgirl, I really wanted to fight with my teacher, but it remained just a dream

[Olga]

Perhaps we can all agree the following is true:

When it comes to catfighting or any style of personal combat there is not one silver bullet that makes you a good fighter. Someone could in theory have plenty of experience catfighting (let’s say ten catfights) but if you say have lost 3/4 of all your catfights…we can hardly say that you’re good them, despite plenty of experience can we?

A lot of factors have to be considered and come together to make you a good fighter

Xoxo
Kate xx

No, Kate, that's not it. Negative experience is still experience. And someone who loses three-quarters of their fights is still more experienced than someone who's never fought. And if you fight a lot, even if you lose, at least you will get rid of the fear of fighting, and one day you will win. But sitting and just dreaming will certainly not make you a good fighter.

I’m not arguing that experience is not important, I’m arguing that experience alone does not make you a successful fighter. I look at experience as an ingredient and as every baker will tell you, you can’t make a cake with eggs alone (Just don’t ask me to bake… I will probably burn the kitchen down).

If I was to make a recipe for a successful fighter, off the top of my head it would go something like this:

Physical fitness / Endurance.
Experience.
Physical attributes (Height, arm reach etc).
Mental toughness (You don’t lose it because your hair got pulled or face scratched).
Emotional control (You control your anger, your anger does not control you).
Confidence.
Luck.

Now have I listed all the ingredients needed to bake a successful cake? Maybe…but chances are I’ve forgotten something

So to summarise just because someone is older, it doesn’t mean they have an advantage in a fight. Also let’s say a total catfight newbie was facing my example who lost 3/4 of all her catfights. Isn’t there an argument that her confidence could perhaps be shot to hell at this point and that all this negative experience could factor against her? I suggest to all that is a very likely possibility, then again maybe she can shrug off that many losses and turn that negative experience into a positive.

So finally I say again there is no one silver bullet that makes you a successful fighter, it’s a combination of factors. Some you can control and some you can’t.

Xoxo
Kate xx

Experience that comes with pain teaches a lot