News:

@Freecatfights: Please follow us on Twitter for news and updates in the event of site outages.

SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016

  • 157 Replies
  • 30936 Views
*

Offline deity17313

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 540
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #120 on: March 20, 2016, 08:43:36 AM »
i would like it if they didnt have submission holds like sarah was using, kinda felt like watching an ultimate surrender video lol but just my 2 cents, felt like it took some fighting elements away from the fight
Ddot

*

Offline D Wagner

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • 88
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #121 on: March 20, 2016, 03:02:00 PM »
what holds did she use that you didn't like?

*

Offline Willie Slick

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 564
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #122 on: March 21, 2016, 06:33:04 AM »
Steve's productions are the best I have seen since ECNWC.


I loved the ECNWC productions, but Suitefights took the basic concept to an entirely new and better level, and in my opinion, hes just getting started.  Seems like forever but this new concept had just taken flight a year ago.  Right about now last year, Stephan from Suitefights was having nothing but trouble getting girls to committ then flake out in the 11th hour, it was not pretty and to his credit, Stephan lost money on cancelled airfare and refunded money to disappointed sponsors.  But like a true American entrepreneur he stuck with it, and now it appears he is redefining the catfighting production community.  Witness more than a couple name producers are now jumping on the sponsorship band wagon, but as is normally the case, the followers dont have the same heart, and the production efforts bear witness.  I for one believe we are entering a golden age of real competitive catfighting with strikingly beautiful ladies wanting to go at it full out for our pleasure, the excitement of competing with bitches in a way which is unique to women, great exposure and press for the catfighters .....and of course, the money.  Its a winning combination for everyone involved, heres hoping the party continues for many great years..... ;)

*

Offline billyk123

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 356
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #123 on: March 21, 2016, 02:53:04 PM »
Steve's productions are the best I have seen since ECNWC.


I loved the ECNWC productions, but Suitefights took the basic concept to an entirely new and better level, and in my opinion, hes just getting started.  Seems like forever but this new concept had just taken flight a year ago.  Right about now last year, Stephan from Suitefights was having nothing but trouble getting girls to committ then flake out in the 11th hour, it was not pretty and to his credit, Stephan lost money on cancelled airfare and refunded money to disappointed sponsors.  But like a true American entrepreneur he stuck with it, and now it appears he is redefining the catfighting production community.  Witness more than a couple name producers are now jumping on the sponsorship band wagon, but as is normally the case, the followers dont have the same heart, and the production efforts bear witness.  I for one believe we are entering a golden age of real competitive catfighting with strikingly beautiful ladies wanting to go at it full out for our pleasure, the excitement of competing with bitches in a way which is unique to women, great exposure and press for the catfighters .....and of course, the money.  Its a winning combination for everyone involved, heres hoping the party continues for many great years..... ;)
absolutely !!!!!!
totally agree
exciting times ahead

*

Offline pinner45

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 340
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #124 on: March 21, 2016, 04:24:48 PM »
Steve's 4k video is sensational. His choice of ladies has been excellent, The only advantage ECNWC had from my perspective was the length of the matches.

On the other hand, 10 minutes of Mira is worth an hour of anything else.

*

Offline Willie Slick

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 564
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #125 on: March 22, 2016, 09:06:57 PM »
I half agree with waslick, yes suitefights is setting the standard now that ecnw have disappeared but I don't subscribe to the bashing of other producers who see what they have done, learn from it and improve their own offering.

The sponsorship model is good for all as it gives some pre fight comfort that it will pay back, the more confidence producers have the more risks they will take and the better the fights get. As long as competition is healthy and fair the end product of all of them and the experience for us fans just gets better,

Now I'm off to open a beer and watch Brooke ( Sarah ) fight sammy.
Apologies as I was not intending to bash other producers.  My point was that as is usually the case, the imitation seldom meets the same level as the original......and this whole sponsorship genere is clearly the result of Suitefights application of that method to stimulate interest and sales in the product. 

*

Offline VideoChatter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 45
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #126 on: March 23, 2016, 10:56:50 AM »
Purchased and enjoyed. Thanks SuiteFights!

*

Offline jewnami

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • 62
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #127 on: March 23, 2016, 12:03:16 PM »
Another top-tier product by a top-tier producer.

I hope Mr. Suitefights gets to the point that production can occur on a regular schedule WHILE MAINTAINING THE QUALITY OF, OR IMPROVING UPON the movies we enjoy.

*

Offline DoYouKnowWhoIAm?

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 832
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #128 on: March 23, 2016, 09:16:25 PM »
I half agree with waslick, yes suitefights is setting the standard now that ecnw have disappeared but I don't subscribe to the bashing of other producers who see what they have done, learn from it and improve their own offering.

The sponsorship model is good for all as it gives some pre fight comfort that it will pay back, the more confidence producers have the more risks they will take and the better the fights get. As long as competition is healthy and fair the end product of all of them and the experience for us fans just gets better,

Now I'm off to open a beer and watch Brooke ( Sarah ) fight sammy.
Apologies as I was not intending to bash other producers.  My point was that as is usually the case, the imitation seldom meets the same level as the original......and this whole sponsorship genere is clearly the result of Suitefights application of that method to stimulate interest and sales in the product.  

No other producer would be allowed to use this section of the forum the way Suitefights do, keeping their sponsorships threads going for as long as they like, without them being locked or deleted for bumping.

Suitefights must have known they were going to be allowed to do that before they even started, or they wouldn't have bothered trying.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2016, 09:25:52 PM by DoYouKnowWhoIAm? »

*

Offline Nutmeg

  • YaBB Administrator
  • God Member
  • *****
  • 1627
    • my old blog (need to log into goggle)
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #129 on: March 23, 2016, 10:45:16 PM »
If you have issues with the way the forum is moderated take it up with the owner. You have been warned about making accusations like this in the past. You won't be warned again.
https://megforrest.blogspot.com/ used to post stuff there. You will have to log into goggle to see it

The biggest fakes here are those posing as humans.

Death will not be a tragedy but an inconvenience for others.

*

Offline D Wagner

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • 88
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #130 on: March 24, 2016, 01:36:04 AM »
I think his comment is correct.

*

Offline Nutmeg

  • YaBB Administrator
  • God Member
  • *****
  • 1627
    • my old blog (need to log into goggle)
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #131 on: March 24, 2016, 01:43:55 AM »
I think his comment is correct.

Your employer and I have had this discussion before. He is welcome to take it to the owner and not send employees to "defend"him. Consider this your final warning too.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2016, 02:55:04 AM by nutmeg78 »
https://megforrest.blogspot.com/ used to post stuff there. You will have to log into goggle to see it

The biggest fakes here are those posing as humans.

Death will not be a tragedy but an inconvenience for others.

*

Mandarin

  • Guest
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #132 on: March 24, 2016, 03:02:19 AM »
Thank you Meg!!

*

Offline GrasslandProductions

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 192
  • http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #133 on: March 24, 2016, 03:19:37 AM »
Thank you Meg!!

I don't think some people understand the difference between bumping and an active thread with many different, unrelated, posters.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2016, 10:41:06 AM by GrasslandProductions »
http://www.clips4sale.com/58999

Fetish producers who create content that includes catfighting, smoking, belly punching and arm wrestling.

http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland

*

Offline DoYouKnowWhoIAm?

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 832
Re: SuiteFights Sponsorship: SAMMY vs BROOKE - March 12, 2016
« Reply #134 on: March 24, 2016, 05:40:11 AM »
I think his comment is correct.

Your employer and I have had this discussion before. He is welcome to take it to the owner and not send employees to "defend"him. Consider this your final warning too.

Are you trying to say that I am D Wagner's employer, or am I misunderstanding your meaning here?