News:

PRODUCERS & OTHER FORUMS SITES: Please note - you MUST HAVE A RECIPROCAL LINK back to this site is you wish to ADVERTISE your site on this forum. If you do not have a link back to us, we will remove your posts with immiediate effect - 25th April 2010

seeking rough and real only

  • 31 Replies
  • 12178 Views
*

Offline gymislandgirl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • 1
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #15 on: July 08, 2010, 06:49:47 AM »
 ;)   think you can take me,,,

*

Offline archrulz80

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 48
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #16 on: July 08, 2010, 10:33:37 PM »
Hopefully there will be some pictures of this match. best of luck to both girls.

*

Offline saracats

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • 7
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2010, 04:24:39 AM »
Jamie,

I been seeing you come in and out of the chat rooms all day, why wont you return my messages???

This shit is going down, u better show up

sara

*

Offline chained66

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 41
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2010, 04:46:42 AM »
Another build up to nothing. That's really unfortunate. I'm surprised she hasn't said anything yet but I am expecting Sara to say exactly the same thing happened on her end.

I wish people would stop wasting everybody's time and stop pretending to be something they obviously aren't.

*

Offline asteri

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • 14
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2010, 07:26:44 AM »
women don't fight, 

Sara is probably a guy

Jemstone only likes the set up not the follow through.

They both exclude men, and that is why they can't fight each other.

For the most part everyone who participates in this forum  is playing a fictitious character.   

Get used to it!
similar to yours

*

Offline Greg

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 459
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2010, 03:00:48 PM »
Amen!

We have NEVER found anyone to come forward from this board. I am the only one on here who posts a phone number 847 516 3652 and Never ever one single call about doing matches or video work.
greg
Greg

*

Offline Snakee

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • 68
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2010, 09:32:51 PM »
There is that fizzle I told you would happen.
Into seeing hair pulling catfights and wrestling. Also fun couple fights. M/M wrestling and even cockfighting. MvsM catfight sounds interesting. 60+ 6’3” 255. How real are you ? You can also find me on MeetFighters.com

*

Offline daveboxfan

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 112
  • I love catfights!
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #22 on: July 16, 2010, 12:52:39 AM »
Don't bet on it

*

Offline Bostoncrab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 41
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #23 on: July 16, 2010, 04:41:12 AM »
Wrong Tom.

*

Offline Greg

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 459
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #24 on: July 16, 2010, 01:23:00 PM »
Tom hit the nail right on the head.  Wake up and smell the coffee.
Greg

*

Offline Bostoncrab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 41
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #25 on: July 16, 2010, 04:34:03 PM »
I don't need to show you or anyone photos to know that real encounters from meetings on here are possible.
We have had success and will continue to have success. You just stay bitter and seated comfortably at your computer with your pants around your ankles.

*

Offline MaskedBunny

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 571
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #26 on: July 16, 2010, 05:25:29 PM »
I would bring up Elaine vs Vira.  They set up the match on here with a challenge, and Vira has the video for sale to prove it.

*

Offline CrashCorrigan

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 321
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #27 on: July 16, 2010, 06:39:58 PM »
I don't need to show you or anyone photos to know that real encounters from meetings on here are possible.
We have had success and will continue to have success. You just stay bitter and seated comfortably at your computer with your pants around your ankles.


Gimme a break!

*

Offline daveboxfan

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 112
  • I love catfights!
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2010, 08:33:45 PM »
This wensday there will be a toplessboxing match followed by cf match limited rules Details and full story to follow. The other girl {her name for now is Jill fightinting Gina Both are n5-3 140 Great tits on both Topless boxing then catfight.

*

Offline asteri

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • 14
Re: seeking rough and real only
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2010, 09:40:24 PM »
And the Beat Goes On!

I don't believe Boston Crab or anyone else who claims that women set up matches here or anywhere else.

As a fan I have come to see that only motivation for most women to participate in this forum is profit.

The women who participate, are paid as session wrestlers, or video performers.   

If you take away the profit motive,  few women, if any, would do a match.

Boston Crab's assertions sound like a guy covering up a lie that he has told himself and others for a long time.

As for me,  I would love if his claims or the claims anyone else  , were true.  It would be pretty cool if the meetings we all fantasize about ever came to pass.   

Sadly,  they don't ,, not here or few other places .

Its probably better to leave the fantasy to the professionals at the video companies, and session wrestlers .  In that way no one really ever gets hurt.   

I suggest that posers here, simply admit that they pose, and explore the fetish from a standpoint of truth.

As for private matches among posers, maybe you can dress as a woman, and meet another poser in a hotel room and call each other "bitch" and slap each other.

If you are a woman that does in-fact fight,  this post was not directed at you.  You are rare, if non existent, and we guys salute you.

We don't need proof, its all ready late in the game,  the lights have come on the field,  we are playing the final innings and we all know the score.

Anyone disagree?
similar to yours