News:

@Freecatfights: Please follow us on Twitter for news and updates in the event of site outages.

Review: ECC84-Hollie vs Maggie

  • 18 Replies
  • 5434 Views
*

Offline shana

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 108
Re: Review: ECC84-Hollie vs Maggie
« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2013, 03:47:02 AM »
Newborn Panties reminded me of Goebbels.

*

Offline braandpanties

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • 19
Re: Review: ECC84-Hollie vs Maggie
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2013, 01:36:35 PM »

Mazes tov. Tell him to upgrade his equipment. Run has what two posts on here and I have four or five? You are a wierd dude.


You have eleven posts now, all attacks on the same producer and you only created this account yesterday!

Take those panties off your head and behave yourself.

This an obvious hatchet job by someone with a grudge and everybody can see it for what it is.

{alt}

*

Offline East Coast Cats

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 619
    • east coast cats.com
Re: Review: ECC84-Hollie vs Maggie
« Reply #17 on: August 21, 2013, 06:16:52 PM »

I've read through all the posts on this topic since my first entry and to summarize:

I bought the video and thought the quality was quite poor.  Shana and Walker have seen the video and think the quality is just fine.  So customers can make their judgements accordingly.

Braandpanties (I love that name!) is on my side and doesn't like the ECC picture quality and posted some youtubes to prove the point.  That's not quite fair because repeated bootlegging on yahoo can really degrade video quality.

Angermanagement offered insight into ECC video resolution and how it has improved.  However, the Hollie/Maggie video DOES NOT, I repeat, DOES NOT fill the screen (a smallish picture in the middle) so it renders resolution irrelvant.

Lastly, some garbage was mentioned about me trying to gain personal information about one of the ECC fighters from the ECC owner, John.  This is completely and totally false. Completely and totally.  John has always impressed me as a stand-up guy so I can only assume he is mistaking me for someone else.  My hope is that he will restore my good name.

Rich
Address this now and some later. I said I "refused to give you information about Pandora" because it was a "privacy issue". Your wording, attributed to me, sounds a tad more ominous (that you were "trying to gain personal information"), but not what I wrote. This as you recall had to do with my delaying the release of Pandora's 12th video with ECC.  You asked a few times to tell you why, and I said it was a "privacy issue". It still is, and I will protect her privacy rather than dealing with the possibility of not releasing her 12th match.  Btw, she looked great and fought well. Later today I'll be glad to give more information about my former videographer.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2013, 06:46:14 PM by East Coast Cats »

*

Offline rin753

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 316
Re: Review: ECC84-Hollie vs Maggie
« Reply #18 on: August 21, 2013, 07:05:03 PM »

You wrote:

"This as you recall had to do with my delaying the release of Pandora's 12th video with ECC.  You asked a few times to tell you why, and I said it was a "privacy issue". It still is, and I will protect her privacy rather than dealing with the possibility of not releasing her 12th match."


Gotcha! I support and applaud your policy of protecting the privacy of your fighters. Thanks.

Rich