News:

PRODUCERS & OTHER FORUMS SITES: Please note - you MUST HAVE A RECIPROCAL LINK back to this site is you wish to ADVERTISE your site on this forum. If you do not have a link back to us, we will remove your posts with immiediate effect - 25th April 2010

4.3 Rita Hayworth vs Ursula Andress

  • 3 Replies
  • 2820 Views
*

Offline Glamour Fights

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 1261
  • Love Glamous Celebrities in Catfghts!
4.3 Rita Hayworth vs Ursula Andress
« on: January 06, 2009, 06:46:34 PM »
Ursula batters Rita so badly that Rita is taken off to the hospital
Rita Hayworth {16}
Ursula Andress {33}
{alt}{alt}
38 years old 5'6" 120 pounds
20 years old 5'5" 125 pounds
35C-26-35
37C-22-36
{alt}{alt}
« Last Edit: January 27, 2009, 03:56:49 PM by glamour_fights »
{alt}

*

petelv

  • Guest
Re: 4.3 Rita Hayworth vs Ursula Andress
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2009, 12:42:04 AM »
Ursula.

*

Offline Foam

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 46
Re: 4.3 Rita Hayworth vs Ursula Andress
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2009, 07:24:53 AM »
What a great match-up: the beautiful and often hard-edged Rita Hayworth, an ill-time screen icon, against the curvy yet muscled Ursula Andress, who set the standard for Bond girls. I'm going to guess that Ursula nips Rita, but I won't complain either way. Good work.

For those of us who came in late, though, what's with the ages? Since they don't necessarily reflect the actresses ages at the time they were taken, is there another criteria at work?

*

Offline Glamour Fights

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 1261
  • Love Glamous Celebrities in Catfghts!
Re: 4.3 Rita Hayworth vs Ursula Andress
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2009, 06:24:40 PM »
For those of us who came in late, though, what's with the ages? Since they don't necessarily reflect the actresses ages at the time they were taken, is there another criteria at work?

All the fights take place in 1956 and the ages reflect that provided the birth dates listed are correct. My criteria and precedence for choosing pictures:
1. Similar poses to provide as good a comparison as possible.
2. Full body shots that show as much of the legs and bodies as possible.
3. Unique or interesting shots.
4. Shots that feature the two women together at the same time. If they are in combat so much the better.
5. Pictures that are close in age given. At least not ages vastly different.. For example there are pictures of Claudia Cardinale and Brigitte Bardot fighting but they are in their 50s or 60s so I probably won't use those.

These are guidelines for me and I use poetic license at times so the stated precedence is not cast in concrete. Probably the overall riding criterion is visually and esthetically pleasing.

P.S. I hope you don't mind a little education but your question should be "...other criteria at work?" or "another criterion at work?" a common mix up of the plural vs the singular.
{alt}