I read in a post here by some-one associated with ECNWC that there were more than two submissions in Gemma vs Brooke, but Bob, the producer, edited some out because he doesn’t like his fights to be too one-sided. The fact that many fans, like me, enjoy one-sided fights as much as even matches, and a lot more than indecisive draws, doesn’t seem to matter to him. Maybe he likes throwing his money away, who knows.
I think Gemma is very sexy, and it would have been her I wanted to fuck at the end of this fight, rather than Brooke. I’m not one of those guys who automatically finds the winner of a catfight sexier than the loser. I always pick my favourite before the fight begins. And, usually, she will still be my favourite when it ends. Whether she wins or, like poor Gemma in this one, gets annihilated.
It has to said though, that the only reason Gemma was unbeaten when she faced Brooke was that her 2 previous matches at ECNWC were not real, competitive fights. She and Brittany were well matched, but no way could two untrained girls like them go at it hammer and tongs for 3/4 of an hour, or how ever long that "fight" was supposed to have lasted, without either one getting the better of it. Neither was really trying to beat up the other, they were just trying to keep the fight going. That seemed obvious to me.
Gemma and Hollie Dunaway were most definitely not well matched. Hollie is a trained grappler and former world pro boxing champion. Gemma, as Brooke demonstrated, couldn't fight her way out of a wet paper bag. If Hollie had wanted to she could have put Gemma down and out in less than a minute. Trust me, she was carrying Gemma, not fighting her.
Though Gemma can't really fight, she is a good catfighter, in the context we are discussing here, because she looks good, tries hard and doesn't give up unless she has too. That's all it takes, really.
