Where was I when this debate started?
Most people on this thread know my stance on hair pulling from another thread which I'm sure is what gave birth to this initial debate. Here's my 2 cents on the matter I fully agree hair pulling is essential to a catfight but I'm on board 100% with 10counts take. Heres an example of 2 of my personal favorites out now Charlie vs Brooke at suitefights and Pandora vs killer sex at catzreview both are perfect examples of the right amount of hair pulling in a real catfights. Even though I feel Charlie/Brooke was juuusst a tad bit one sided (just a bit) I still rank it easy in my top five all time and it had very little hair pulling . Pandora /k. Sex my only complaint was too much interference but still top 5 it had hair pulling but PLENTY of other attacks (one in particular
). I also feel catzreview balances out the hair pulling well. I don't know if that's a result of the producer or a choice made by the girls but nonetheless they have a good mixture of holds and attacks.
I agree on Catzreview in general and KS vs Pandora in particular, which was a great catfight - rough, but sexy, and no doubt at the end who the better fighter was. Charlie vs Brooke though I didn't like at all.
The Latest from SF, Rosie vs Jess, was much better for me, because both girls were hot and they had the right attitude to what they were doing ... trying their best to win, but not scared to lose.
I liked the decisive outcome, and the moaning and whimpering from Jess when Rosie was pulling her hair turned me on.
In general, I think fans of real, unscripted catfighting just need to accept that in a real fight, anything can happen, and not become fixated on one particular tactic or type of fight. Let the women fight how they want to fight and enjoy it as a genuine, physical confrontation and competition between two women trying to defeat each other by whatever means, within the rules of the fight, of course.