News:

PRODUCERS & OTHER FORUMS SITES: Please note - you MUST HAVE A RECIPROCAL LINK back to this site is you wish to ADVERTISE your site on this forum. If you do not have a link back to us, we will remove your posts with immiediate effect - 25th April 2010

Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?

  • 22 Replies
  • 9016 Views
*

Offline rin753

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 327
Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« on: May 20, 2016, 02:49:08 AM »
It seems that everyone is beside themselves with anticipation over this fight.  Oh boy!  Can't wait!  Oh boy!  Can't Wait!

Well I bought the Mila Rose vs Sarah Brooke fight from Phat Pharrahs and it was completely one sided.  I guess some guys like that, but to me it was a dud.

What am I missing here?

Rich

*

Offline billyk123

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 356
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2016, 03:44:56 AM »
It seems that everyone is beside themselves with anticipation over this fight.  Oh boy!  Can't wait!  Oh boy!  Can't Wait!

Well I bought the Mila Rose vs Sarah Brooke fight from Phat Pharrahs and it was completely one sided.  I guess some guys like that, but to me it was a dud.

What am I missing here?

Rich

really ??????????

*

Offline Willie Slick

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 563
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2016, 04:51:16 AM »
Yea, its kinda like, you had to have watched ACTS 1&2 of the play in order to appreciate ACT 3, make sense?

*

Offline DoYouKnowWhoIAm?

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 826
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2016, 05:28:10 AM »
It seems that everyone is beside themselves with anticipation over this fight.  Oh boy!  Can't wait!  Oh boy!  Can't Wait!

Well I bought the Mila Rose vs Sarah Brooke fight from Phat Pharrahs and it was completely one sided.  I guess some guys like that, but to me it was a dud.

What am I missing here?

Rich

Lol. Not everyone Rich. I don't mind one-sided catfights, because that usually means a clear victory for one girl over the other, which I like. But I didn't buy this one because I read that, though one girl dominated, there were no submissions and the outcome was decided on points by the producer at the end, which the weaker girl refused to accept.

Now to me that sounds like a match-up that shouldn't be repeated. But you never know, maybe the rematch will be better, as in ... one will definitely beat the other and the loser will be in no doubt that she did lose.

*

Offline DoYouKnowWhoIAm?

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 826
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2016, 05:37:07 AM »
Yea, its kinda like, you had to have watched ACTS 1&2 of the play in order to appreciate ACT 3, make sense?

well put. if you only see the first and last part, won't make sense, need the middle.
                                                                 
{alt}
                                                          
                                                  
                                                  :)
« Last Edit: May 20, 2016, 05:38:01 AM by DoYouKnowWhoIAm? »

*

Offline rin753

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 327
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2016, 08:20:58 PM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

I'm a bit unclear on the meaning of this sentence.  Sorry for my ignorance on that.  And so I ask the author to contact me privately and and answer the question...."WTF does that mean?"

Rich (who probably made a big mistake starting this discussion)

*

Offline psy999999

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 291
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2016, 11:37:28 PM »
Personally I'm willing to bet a) Mila will be a lot more motivated to win this time, and b) having had several more matches since she fought Sarah, Mila will have a better idea how to fight.  As we have already seen, most women (and men) have no idea how to fight until they have been in one or two fights.

But, that's just me.  To the OP, maybe you should not pay to sponsor.  Listen to the reviews afterwards and decide then if you want to buy or not, after all no one is holding a gun to your head.

Probably better than posting in two separate threads that you don't think it is going to be worth watching...

*

Offline GrasslandProductions

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 192
  • http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2016, 03:30:37 PM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

Yeah, I have no idea why you ever put this information up on your twitter feed days and weeks before you would post anything here?

http://www.clips4sale.com/58999

Fetish producers who create content that includes catfighting, smoking, belly punching and arm wrestling.

http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland

*

Mandarin

  • Guest
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2016, 04:41:09 PM »
Just my opinion but I have a feeling the Sarah vs Mila fight will be much better than their first fight.  Both women have demonstrated they can take punishment and do not give up easily.  But Mila seems to be improving steadily and is motivated this time.  Add to that the fact they have a genuine dislike of each other and you have the makings of a very hard fought and even catfight.  I predict a full twenty minutes and Sarah winning two to one

*

Offline billyk123

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 356
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2016, 05:29:02 PM »
Well im sponsoring

Beleive me - this one is gonna go off like a firecracker

if you dont sponsor then dont cry if you miss out

Steve has pulled out the big one here and deserves to be supported

this will be fight of the year

*

Offline rin753

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 327
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2016, 02:29:13 AM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

I'm a bit unclear on the meaning of this sentence.  Sorry for my ignorance on that.  And so I ask the author to contact me privately and and answer the question...."WTF does that mean?"

Rich (who probably made a big mistake starting this discussion)

Just so everyone knows (and then I'll drop this) I sent Sands Kev a cordial private message asking him to explain his comment.  No response.

Rich

*

Offline Willie Slick

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 563
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2016, 02:44:56 AM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

I'm a bit unclear on the meaning of this sentence.  Sorry for my ignorance on that.  And so I ask the author to contact me privately and and answer the question...."WTF does that mean?"

Rich (who probably made a big mistake starting this discussion)

Just so everyone knows (and then I'll drop this) I sent Sands Kev a cordial private message asking him to explain his comment.  No response.

Rich

He has been on this conspiracy theory thing for some time.......has done it both here and on twitter......think he is dialed into some producers who compete in this space, and he has something to do with it.....I think...he's just knows too much and gets too emotional to be just a fan.........it got pretty sporty a few months back about all this alias this, and I-know-who-you-really-are.....that.......it's wierd.........because I think he came close to getting banned a while back for this by the moderators, my guess is he is not wanting to keep it going.........anyway, I'm sure at some level, it's about revenue and who's out doing whom..........but the moderators on this site are pretty good about keeping those distractions to a minimum.......so long as you dont hit any of his hot buttons.......he puts up some pretty good posts........

*

Offline GrasslandProductions

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 192
  • http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2016, 03:57:15 AM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

I'm a bit unclear on the meaning of this sentence.  Sorry for my ignorance on that.  And so I ask the author to contact me privately and and answer the question...."WTF does that mean?"

Rich (who probably made a big mistake starting this discussion)

Just so everyone knows (and then I'll drop this) I sent Sands Kev a cordial private message asking him to explain his comment.  No response.

Rich

He has been on this conspiracy theory thing for some time.......has done it both here and on twitter......think he is dialed into some producers who compete in this space, and he has something to do with it.....I think...he's just knows too much and gets too emotional to be just a fan.........it got pretty sporty a few months back about all this alias this, and I-know-who-you-really-are.....that.......it's wierd.........because I think he came close to getting banned a while back for this by the moderators, my guess is he is not wanting to keep it going.........anyway, I'm sure at some level, it's about revenue and who's out doing whom..........but the moderators on this site are pretty good about keeping those distractions to a minimum.......so long as you dont hit any of his hot buttons.......he puts up some pretty good posts........

A very small minority of producers have had multiple handles on this site to give a false popularity to their products. They were caught and penalized.

It has made some people very skeptical of posters on this site. Granted, I think most of this has ended, but the cynicism is semi-warneted. Nothing against you if you are an average fan.

http://www.clips4sale.com/58999

Fetish producers who create content that includes catfighting, smoking, belly punching and arm wrestling.

http://www.facebook.com/stephen.grassland

*

Offline DoYouKnowWhoIAm?

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 826
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2016, 01:56:10 PM »
Ha Ha Ha I wondered how long it would take for the usual suspects to pop up with a trolling thread  :)

I'm a bit unclear on the meaning of this sentence.  Sorry for my ignorance on that.  And so I ask the author to contact me privately and and answer the question...."WTF does that mean?"

Rich (who probably made a big mistake starting this discussion)

Just so everyone knows (and then I'll drop this) I sent Sands Kev a cordial private message asking him to explain his comment.  No response.

Rich

He has been on this conspiracy theory thing for some time.......has done it both here and on twitter......think he is dialed into some producers who compete in this space, and he has something to do with it.....I think...he's just knows too much and gets too emotional to be just a fan.........it got pretty sporty a few months back about all this alias this, and I-know-who-you-really-are.....that.......it's wierd.........because I think he came close to getting banned a while back for this by the moderators, my guess is he is not wanting to keep it going.........anyway, I'm sure at some level, it's about revenue and who's out doing whom..........but the moderators on this site are pretty good about keeping those distractions to a minimum.......so long as you dont hit any of his hot buttons.......he puts up some pretty good posts........

A very small minority of producers have had multiple handles on this site to give a false popularity to their products. They were caught and penalized.
 

I don't if this is true or not. But I do know that I was falsely accused of being a producer's "handle" by the same character who attacked Rich in this thread, then banned from the forum for a month shortly after that, for reasons which were never fully explained to me.

*

Offline pinner45

  • God Member
  • *****
  • 341
Re: Sarah Brooke/Mila Rose...... Huh?
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2016, 04:28:42 PM »
FYI      Kev is facing a very serious health issue right now.

The guy is fighting it hard. Maybe we shouldn't be fighting him.