In her twitter she commented, after the first fight, that the sponsored money was not enough for a "face slapping" catfight. 50$ and you don't even get face slapping? I call that BS.
Plus, that's completely arbitrary. You don't even know what you are getting. They can't just decide with no ground basis that the sponsorship was not enough for "X given tactics".
Well, to each his own, but I would rather not support overpriced catfight, even if they might be good.
I agree with this. I don't think Tilly is being intentionally malicious it's more that she's just inexperienced, but this is rotten. Asking for $2,100 (and $2,700 for face slapping) up front in $50 increments and not even knowing the type of match you are guaranteed to get/if there even is going to be a match is just wrong. Also, I have no reason to think Tilly is sketch, but periodically updating the amount raised on Twitter with no way to verify is not the way to do it either.
I think sponsorships are a good way to go about making this happen, but just be up front about if the match is happening and what the rules are.
Just too many redflags here for me. A rookie catfight producer, charging more than double what is the going "rate" as opposed to the industry leader (Suitefights), no firm rule-set and, unfortunately, I also had less than stellar experiences with Sarah Brooke with one of those being a Tilly/Sarah fight.
I wish Tilly the best. She's beautiful and I've seen her in some catfights I've enjoyed in the past and the more the merrier that are producing real catfights. I hope this is her "ironing" out the process and improving going forward. I'd love to see if Tilly is producing the real deal or not, but hah, guess I'll be able to tell you sometime in 2019 when they're finally released.
