Staggering hypocrisy, isn't it? The journalist condemns the DVDs as 'pornographic' but don't men fight wearing even less on TV every day and aren't the fans (male and female) of men's boxing and wrestling turned on in exactly the same way? They may not admit it, but they are. And why, Daily Mirror, an entire page of photos and an article spun out to ten times the necessary length if not to titillate your own readers? In that case aren't you also pornographers? The only difference is that you're hypocrites as well. This type of journalism (which used to be the stock-in-trade of the News of the World) is best described as 'parasite pornography' - the pornography that dares not speak its name. Personally I'd far rather have a pint with the promoter, whoever he is, than the person who wrote that article or the editor who put him up to it.
