[cock_duel]

After watching the events on this forum over the past couple of weeks it struck me an ideal catfight would be between Julie and DurbanBlonde.  Both women seem determined fighters with both displaying a degree of viciousness not often seen in women.  If these two hellcats were to clash in an ultimate no holds barred catfight to a finish, both women nude and locked away so there is no interference from anyone until one women leaves the room victorious, who does the group think would be the better woman, Julie or DurbanBlonde...let the voting and catfight begin.  Pictures of both women and their stats can be seen below.

[roadie]

Yes, I love this matchup too, CD. Two equal women catfighting in the nude. My vote went to Julie. Her track record is great and Durbanblonde doesn't have a record that I know of.   All things being equal, my money is on Julie to walk out, bruised but walking, unlike Durbanblonde.

[Andre]

Woah! This is a pretty fucked up message thread. I don't know what turns my stomach more, the grotesque homoerotic photo of the penis and the pubes to the left, or the ugly as fuck mature porn blonde that has been lifted from some random US porn site and is now being used by a ('please play along with me and pretend that I'm a woman') bloke based in the UK who did not have the sense to use a photo of a woman that looks at least British.

The only good thing about this poll vote is the photo of Julie. At least no one is pretending to be her, and she is attractive.

Everything else on this page just looks shit in a really bad way.

[petelv]

I voted for Julie , based on her catfighting record.

[Andre]

'Andre the anonymous'.... and this is coming from a guy who goes by the name of 'Cock_Duel' and uses an avatar lifted from a homoerotic website dealing with the fetish of slapping one's schlong against another guy's schlong. Yeah, the last thing you are is anonymous isn't it.

By the way, I never said the ugly old woman in the photo above was a pornstar, I said it was an awful photo lifted from a mature porn website. Anyone's grandma could feature on such sites, they don't have to be a pornstar to qualify. Come to think of it, who the fuck would want to watch such a drag act being drilled anyway?

By the way, you're calling me 'pompous' because what I've wrote has deeply pissed you off which is obvious by the invective you've just wrote. I think the reason for this is because of the clinical accuracy of what I've wrote about those two god awful photos you've posted above; gip inducing to say the least.

Oh, by the way, why is it a case that someone 'doesn't have balls' because they don't fill in an online forum profile? I'd be interested to hear what form of logic or reasoning you base this on? I can honestly inform you now if you are interested by the way. Because I couldn't be arsed to waste my time filling it in as it is irelevant to what I write here. But please do tell us all why members who don't fill in their forum profile 'have no balls'. It will be great to find out because by explaining this to everyone you will inevitably insult the majority of other users on this forum who have also not filled in their forum profile because they couldn't be arsed. But please do tell us why it is a sin in your eyes.

Oh, by the way, I'm definitely open-minded. I'm not easily offended either. But I don;t believe that everyone's 'opinions' are equally valid. For instance YOU. You display homoerotic pornographic images of men's penises on a message forum devoted to the interest of female fighting. Now, I'm being honest with you when I say that image looks fucking awful, I mean, the poor guy ain't that well endowed, the pubic hair would make most women vomit, and the whole image is definitely more suited to a gay porn website rather than a 'FREE CATFIGHT FORUM'. Now, this I would say is a very good point I am making. I'm not opposing you getting off on rubbing your penis against another guy's penis or posting photos of such intellectual activities on the internet. But don't you honestly think there are a huge variety of websites more suitable for that interest out there than here at Debee's Catfght Forum.

On the matter of the ugly mature porn photo of the botox blonde chick. Well, yeah, she is fucking awful looking, I will have to admit that. Plus it's a well known photo used by a guy based in the UK who is terrible at impersonating a woman in his style of writing.

So, that is why I posted my initial post, because this message thread is bad on two points,. i.e. you and your ugly penis photo, and the dog tired pic of the granny. Julie is OK though.

There you go straight up honesty for you. But I'm sure you won't be happy a second time with what I've said. In a way though, your reply now makes this thread interesting as it gives me an opportunity have fun talking to the weird guy with the ugly penis photo avatar, which is quite funny and entertaining for other people reading this.

[Meady]

Now, now boys steady on, we don't want to read about your differences, it is rather boring.  I do not however agree with Andre, everyone is free to express their opinions equally, I for one enjoy this particular matchup despite Andre's feelings, if you aren't comfortable with an open style of forum I suggest you go elsewhere, I am sure you wouldn't be missed

[catfightfan36]

I ve actually spoken to DurbanBlonde so I pick her to win this fight.

[Andre]

So you actually want to fuck me in my ear now. That is amusingly strange.

You seem to be getting the word ‘offended’ mixed up with someone asking you why you are posting homoerotic  images of men’s penises on a forum populated by heterosexual men whose interest is catfighting. I don’t have to be offended to find that image of two men’s cocks rubbish and unappealing. Stop being such a bigoted right-wing fascist expecting over 6000 people on a catfight forum to suddenly and magically become interested in your non catfight related gay fetish of seeing two men’s cocks slap against each other. It’s not  ‘offensive’ it’s just badly located on the wrong forum on the internet.

Also, you’ve had the lack of taste to post what is truly a fucking grotesque photo of two particularly ugly men’s cocks with mingy red pubic hair. Yeah. I really am the bad guy for not  liking that photo aren’t  I  you fucking idiot!

Also,  this is not an ‘open forum’ as you allege. What this forum is however is a forum run by people who are liberal minded about what people write in their posts related to women fighting women, or perhaps mixed wrestling too at a push. What that does not mean is that any clueless fuckwit can start posting images related to his self orientated fetish that has nothing to do with catfighting.

Yeah, of course you’re right, it’s an open forum so let’s open this forum for people posting on any given subject of interest.

“Ooh, look. I’m a guy who is really obsessed with the Wankel Rotary engine:”



“...Don’t you go telling me that I can’t post photos of my obsession about engines  on a forum section entitled ‘General Discussion about Fem-fighting’, or I going to start getting pissy with you and quoting my civil rights of free speech.

HORSE FUCKING:



“Oh how I love to wank off to fake photos of horses fucking women and love to post them on a section entitled: ‘General Discussion about Fem-fighting’ on a forum dedicated to female fighting. But don’t you go telling me I can’t talk about horse fucking or I’ll accuse you of being a bigoted Nazi fuck who threatens the freedom of speech.”

You dumbass! It’s got nothing to do with being  ‘offended ‘. It’s about pointing out to a dumb fuck like you that there are other more appropriate websites and forums for you to indulge in your gay fetish about men’s cocks. What kind of reaction did you expect from us here? Did you expect to be applauded for posting photos of men’s cocks that no one here has an interest in?

On the subject of the ugly granny photo. Are you implying that I am prohibited from having the freedom to say that I find her fucking ugly and that the photo has been lifted from a granny porn site by a British guy who impersonates women on the internet? So how is prohibiting my freedom of speech compatible with your idea of an ‘open forum’.  Didn’t think that one through now did ya.

Re: Catfightfan36. So please do enlighten us all. In what way did you actually ‘speak’ to Durbanblonde.

Re: Meady – You seem to be getting the freedom of speech, (an over generalised American concept, it has to be pointed out that does have certain flaws in its universal application) mixed up with allowing inappropriate images of men’s penises to be posted on a forum dedicated to people who love female catfights. I define ‘inappropriate’ here as inappropriately placed on the wrong type of forum for a group of people who have no interest in homoerotic gay porn. This is due to the reason that the majority of femfight fans are heterosexual men who are attracted to women. Why do we want to see men’s penises? I mean do you get turned on by looking at a photo of two men’s penises, one sporting grotesque red pubic hair? Forums are contextually topic orientated on the internet; it does not breach any freedom of speech virtue to say: ‘This is a femfight catfighting forum, why are you posting gay porn images that have nothing to do with catfighting.’

Before anyone else jumps on the ‘everyone has a right to their own opinion’ dumbass shit bandwagon and starts spewing out a lot of pre-packed clichéd waffle about open forums. Just stand back and think why are you defending the right for a bloke called ‘cock-duel’ to post images of grotesque penises on a forum dedicated to female catfighting? Why does he not just maintain his freedom of speech, and go post his fetish images on a forum dedicated to that subject which Debee’s forum is quite clearly not.

[Andre]

Wow! That's an entire post you just wrote where you seem to deliberately avoid intelligently engaging with any of the points I've made.

Is there a reason for that (other than mere rhetoric), or are you just avoiding engaging in an intelligent argument because you are fully aware that I have made a series of perfectly good points that you are unable to comeback with a valid answer to?

Instead of intelligently dealing with my propositions you've lapsed into the following ad hominem rhetorical language:

'wounded little animal'
'madman'
'hides behind his mothers skirt'
'childish'
'idiot'
'I feel sorry for you'
'your dick, it must be microscopic '

Is that about the best comeback you can muster. It's not very witty or intelligent is it. I thought gay men were far wittier than that.

(1) You still seemed to have failed however to explain why you have a homoerotic image of two men's penises on a catfight forum dedicated to female vs. female fighting. How is that relevant to the subject matter of this forum?

(2) You've failed to support your contradictory wish to prohibit my freedom of speech whilst maintaining that said freedom of speech is important.

(3) You've failed to propose a valid reason why a catfight forum should encourage gay porn images, images of Wankel Rotary Engines, and Horse fucking not in anyway related the true subject of this forum, i.e. catfights.

In fact, nothing in your message even vaguely addresses how I have fundamentally demonstrated how most of what you are saying is ill thought out spurious rhetoric.

And you're calling me uneducated. That's ironic.

[Zulu]

I disagree with cock_duel trying to discuss anything with Andre the fuckwit, the only thing he would understand is the direct approach

Andre you are a boring cxnt, no one here is interested in what the fuck you think, now fuck off you are not welcome here, if we want to discuss freedom of speech we will, without asking your permission you cxnt

[Andre]

I think you forgot to proof read that first sentence, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever, it's a grammatical mismash. Which leads me to believe with your lack of a grasp on the English language, your fervent desire to look at photos of men's penises, and defend the right to do so, even if it means looking at men's cocks on a forum devoted to catfights, you're not exactly the man for the job when it comes to defending the freedom of speech via images of schlongs.

Perhaps I am a 'boring cxnt' to you personally, as you so eloquently put it, because I am criticisng the display of two ugly cocks on a forum devoted to catfights. A photo perchance you get a personal stimulation from looking at?

And if you are not 'interested in what the fuck you think', why then have you been motivated to post a comment? Anyone who couldn't give a fuck, wouldn't even be bothered to write something or get involved. So that's not entirely believable now is it.

Also, can you answer me this simple question: where have I demanded that if anyone wishes to discuss the topic of the freedom of speech, they must first ask me permission? It's just that I don't understand what you mean by the following comment you made:

if we want to discuss freedom of speech we will, without asking your permission you cxnt. [Zulu]

You really are going to have to put more thought into your writing before you commit to typing it out on a keyboard Cock_Duel.... sorry I meant Zulu.

[TuffDawn]

Hear, hear, well said CD, most of this board is behind you

[Andre]

Ah, but you've tried that one before. Merely lapsing into the tired old 'I'm not responding to you because you are an idiot' line is merely an obvious ad hominem way of getting out of engaging in an intelligent argument. It's like a lot of people saying "we refuse to talk to you because your argument that the world is round is stupid and therefore you are an idiot not worth bothering with".

If I am an idiot which you allege I am, why do you so obviously fear to engage any of my points. If I truly am an idiot, it would be quite easy to prove my points wrong being the intellectually superior person you present yourself to be, albeit with a couple of cocks to signify your online personality.

Also you've lapsed into cliche speak again instead of thinking up your own original sentences. Why can't you think for yourself instead of using other people's cliches. The problem with cliches is that they reply upon 'common sense' which much of the time is an expression of an institutional but not necessarily intelligent line of thought. For example your statement:

I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion no matter how idiotic it is

So you believe that someone has a right to rape a 4 year old child, kill it afterwards, and then bury it in a shallow grave without telling anyone?

Well of course you don't, but effectively, when you say: "I believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion no matter how idiotic it is'. you are basically endorsing anything, even child rape and murder... why? Because of the following:

Let's take the example of Brian. Brian is a person who holds two very strong 'opinions'. According to you, Brian is entitled to his opinions no matter how idiotic they are. Here are Brian's two strongly held opinions:

1) Brian believes that there is nothing wrong with raping a 4 year old child and then murdering it.

2) Brian believes that all opinions should be acted upon in the real world.

That means according to you, Brian is entitled to both opinions, as you say: 'everyone is entitled to their own opinion no matter how idiotic it is'. Now opinion 1 & 2 are both opinions. So basically the logic of what you are saying is that you would defend Brian's right to hold and act upon the opinion to rape and murder 4 year old children.

Because if you disagree with what I'm saying, then that would entail that you do NOT believe that everyone is entitled to their opinion no matter how idiotic it is.

Now, this is me, (the idiot) thinking for myself here, and by so doing utilizing simple logic and reason to analyse an ill thought out cliche that you have just used. Now I'm not expecting you to respond or in any way engage with what I have just intellectually demonstrated. You'll probably just side step it and throw a load of insults as you only know how. But this is a demonstration I've just provided of how to think for yourself in a independent and philosophical manner as opposed to lazily using cliche speak that can easily be proven at fault.

Yes, you are correct that you are free to choose an avatar. And I'm free to criticise said avatar as a vulgar grotesque image that has no relavance to catfighting, and just acts as an unpleasing image for real catfight fans who come here to read and look at photos of women fighting instead of other men's ugly cocks. And your point being?

I don't think I am 'smarter than everyone else', but I do believe I have an ability to be more rational and intelligent in my argumentation process than what you have demonstrated so far in your childish insults and side-stepping rhetoric to avoid engaging several of the fair points I have made.

You are also not 'obliged to answer me', you can freely choose not to. But when you reply with smart ass comments attempting to seem superior to me and failing terribly in the process, don't get all pissy and start quoting your human rights on a catfight forum because it makes you sound ridiculous and farcical. I'm only too happy to show you up for this when you act the smart ass with me. And I think you realize now that I can give back far better than what you are throwing at me.

Also, you seem to repeatedly misjudge my education level in an attempt to insult me, this time after time after time fails to strengthen your rhetoric as it only gives me an opportunity to write in a way that demonstrates the erroneous nature of what you allege.

Very little of what you are saying is formed in intellgent argument and you seem to instead rely upon cliched tired old insults to try and impress people which you are embarrassingly failing to do so long into this message thread. At least there is one thing you said earlier that turned out to be the truth, as demonstrated by the fact that you are still 'trading words' with me. Think about it.

I will waste no more time trading words with an idiot. [cock_duel]

[Dionysus]

Hear, hear, well said CD, most of this board is behind you

Well I'm certainly not!

And who gave you permission to speak on my behalf?

I must say that watching young Andre at work here is non-disimilar to observing a sprightly mongoose dance around a rather confused looking fat cobra.

Well said Andre! When I come here to view sexy young ladies tussling with each other and to read the discussions of catfighting, the last thing I want to see is a graphic and awful photo of two men's cocks with surrounding pubic hair suddenly appearing on my monitor screen. If I wanted to view such homesexual images, I'd go to a flipping gay porn website not Debee's Catfight forum.

I will also note that Andre's arguments have been entertainingly precise, clear and logical as opposed to 'cock_duel's' tendency to just attempt insults and behave like an absolute petulant arse in response.

I don't want to look at men's cocks on this forum, that's off topic and unrelated, it's also bloody well ugly to boot.

And if we are to do a hijack of this forum to force people to look at photos of elderly ladies. Then let's at least utilize images of women who have dignity, decorum, and Empire:

[tomthefightfan]

This one is easy.
Julie looks lethal, her eyes have got that "true fighter look".
DurbanBlonde just looks...well...
My guess is that Julie will have DurbanBlonde crying out her submission quite quick.