[Capital City Catfights]

An intense and vicious catfight which has both ladies going all out for the entire match. Slaps, struggling and an amazing toss to the canvas by the hair of one of the combantants makes this a fight not to be missed.


http://flic.kr/p/bcSgh6


Marla, an excellent submission catfighter, wanted a shot at one of our former feateured models. Tegan, who last time out went by the name Ulga gladly accepted.  The results is a slapping , agressive one submission match up not to be missed.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

Steve, the link is right underneath CCC's post. It's the "clips4sale" one.  I've just bought the fight myself and I'm waiting for it to download now.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

Yeah, this is a good fight. A bit shorter than I expected, given the length of the clip - they have interviews before and after the action - but while it lasted, both girls gave it everything they had.
I didn't see any face slaps either, BTW, but it wasn't really that kind of fight. They were too closely tangled most of the time to land any. There was one quite hard body punch landed by Marla to Tegan's kidney area though, just a few seconds before she executed the hair pulling throw-down you can see in the photo, which took the wind right out of poor Tegan!
Marla seems to have quite a flair for spectacular and unexpected moves like that. In her first fight she took Charlie by surprise with a flying head-but to the stomach. I reckon that in a nhb fight she'd be a real handful.
This match though, I'd describe as mainly very rough hair pulling and wrestling, which ends with one girl immobilised on the canvas, wrapped up in her own arms with her opponent on top of her.

[angrmgmt]

The fight is less than four minutes long, but the entire clip is over nine minutes. Some editing is definitely in order.
As for the fight, it is very fluid, with both women struggling to get the upper-hand. Another enjoyable effort by CCC.

[angrmgmt]

...for me the best is roma becky...

I think that has been my fav so far, too, for a couple of reasons.

I like the living room/hotel room setting over use of a boxing ring. I know using a ring is all the rage among producers now, but I think a small, carpeted room is a better fit for a good action-filled catfight.

I also enjoy watching Becky catfight. She is the quintessential woman-next-door, and she is getting better with each fight. I hope to see more of her in future CCC productions.

[JohnMoog]

Paragraph 4 refutation: Energy can be regained via a rest between submissions. It's as simple as that.

I agree, and would add that if girls can't fight intensely for more than 5 minutes, some cardio is indicated.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

But would they fight as hard if they knew there would be more submissions? Would they give up more quickly? With only one submission, these girls are fighting to the bitter end, and they will do whatever it takes to not give up that one time.

In a street fight, after one submission, do the fighters continue? In MMA, do they start over after a tap?

I really think allowing multiple submissions would weaken the overall fights. Why should they fight hard to get out of this when they know all they have to do is submit and they can start over? They know if they give up, they lose.

Plus, if they are fighting all out, how much energy do you think they would have after 10 minutes. I look at these fights as sprints to a single finish, not jogging for 15 or 20 minutes.

If two women are fighting over a job or a boyfriend, they are not fighting multiple submissions. They are fighting until one woman is defeated.

This is a very good summation of the advantages of one-submission-wins-it catfights as opposed to the longer fights which are decided by a count back of submissions scored at the end.
The fact that multiple submission fights also have a lot going for them and can sometimes be better than the short fights does not make what Steve wrote illogical or indicate that he is a CCC patsy.
Which are more exiting to watch, 100m or 1500m races? To me, that is a silly question. Depends what happens in the races, and what kind of race the spectator is hoping to see.
I think that Tegan vs Marla would PROBABLY have been even better if had been longer, because I think the girl who scored the first submission would have carried on dominating and scoring more, and the loser would have carried on doing her best to fight back, and I enjoy fights that follow that particular pattern. But that's just MY preference. Other people like a different kind of outcome altogether.
For instance, the ECNWC fight between Vira and Summer is regarded by many fans as a classic, and I can understand why. To me though, that fight is unsatisfying and spoiled by the "count-back" format. The reason I say this is that it begins with one woman dominating and scoring multiple submissions. For some reason though, either through tiredness or because she knows she's too far ahead to be caught, the winner eases up and the fight ends with the "loser" on top and scoring the final submission.
Now from my point of view, that's an unsatisfactory outcome, but I'm not going to start throwing insults at people who think otherwise!

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

The comment you've indicated as a quote of what I wrote wasn't actually written by me. It was written by Steve.

Yeah, it was what Steve wrote that I wanted to comment on.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

And Kafkod/Steve, perhaps you're right. It may be better for the majority of catfight fans to just boycott companies like CCC and stop purchasing their products instead of paying money for a 3 minute 13 second catfight like the one being promoted in this thread, and feeling that it is too short to pay any money for.

It would be a shame if Kafkod and Steve were correct in that we should not provide constructive feedback to a producer and avoid criticising others tastes by requesting longer catfights.

   I didn't say anything of the kind. Don't think Steve did either.

[JohnMoog]

What happened to all of Dio's posts?  Let me get this straight: creeps can fantasize here about erotic activity with family members, but intelligent, witty, urbane comments so threaten the public order that they must be stomped by the jackboot of censorship?

I agree with the idea of a boycott, and it's basically what I do already.  I have enough quality erotic material from over the years that there's absolutely no need to bother with junk.   

[KatFiteFan]

This is Mike the videographer for Capital City Catfights.

We REALLY DO listen to our customers and try to make adjustments to fit the market.

I think there has been a marked improvement in our product since our first shoots and 80 percent of that has been because of feedback from fans.

Our company motto when it comes to this is:

We Listen....We Evolve......We produce

I feel that any customer who is willing to pay for a product has the right to comment on that product.

so let me know what you think

http://www.flickr.com/photos/63028362@N05/

http://clips4sale.com/studio/39276/Capital-City-Catfights

MIKE

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

Hey Pollman, how come when I posted in this thread you accused me of bumping, yet you keep on posting in it yourself?
If you can't be sensible, at least be consistent.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

Lol. Anybody who compares that grovelling post you made in reply to Mike with the way you've been slagging off his work in your other contributions can see for themselves what a hypocrite you are!
So Tegan vs Marla is "A great yet brief catfight" now?
I'm glad you agree with me at last.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

LOL means Laughing Out Loud, which is exactly what I'm doing right now! Have you ever thought of making a career out of comedy writing? You definitely have a talent for it.

[DoYouKnowWhoIAm?]

I hope I'm allowed to join in this discussion without being accused of "bumping". And Pollman, it would be nice if we could just discuss the issue without any more name calling etc.
Regarding what you wrote about fights being stopped "prematurely", for whatever reason, yeah, they usually are less satisfying to watch. The girls involved will have been pacing themselves for a longer fight, so the result seems a little inconclusive.
On the other hand, if everyone involved knows beforehand that the first submission wins it - including the customers who buy the clip - then how can ending it after the first submission be described as "premature"?
CCC clearly state that these are short , one submission fights, and they price them accordingly.
Regarding ECC, I too am a fan of that producer and a member of their yahoo group. I've read there that ECC are themselves now filming short, single submission fights - the producer refers to them as "one-shot-matches" which they are going to be selling along with their usual 25min matches.
Also, it's true that Marla has had at least one fight with ECC, using the name "Scarlet". That match hasn't been released yet, but if you look at the date when the photographs of her fight with Tegan were taken - 14 Nov - that match clearly took place AFTER her move to ECC. In other words Marla is now fighting for both companies, which - and I think you'll agree with me on this at least - is great news for fans like us.